I wouldn't blame the gentleman from Texas for supporting the V-22 when a great bit of it is built in his district and he needs to defend it. But I'd like to just repeat so that people understand this. So far, the V-22 has cost over $32 billion. When it was initiated in 1986, it was estimated to cost $39 billion. Today, it's estimated to cost $53 billion. Terminating the V-22 would save $10 billion to $12 billion over the next 10 years. Actually, it would save $2\1/2\ billion in funding for procurement of the Navy and Air Force just this year alone. With that, Madam Chair, I'd like to say if you're talking about everything on the table, look at this. It's had its turn, 20, 30 years to prove itself; and it's time that we end this relationship. I yield back the balance of my time.
Lynn C. Woolsey: “I wouldn't blame the gentleman from Texas for supporting the V-22 when a great bit of it is built in his district and he…”
Share
More from Lynn C. Woolsey
Thank you, George, for doing this. Thank you for honoring those of us that have been here and now are leaving. I arrived feeling very green and feeling very good 20 years ago. I had no idea how little I knew about how to get something done…
We know that the smelt has its place in the ecosystem and that, yes, indeed Southern California needs water.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment. The Clerk read as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title) insert the following: Sec. __. The total amount of appropriations made…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California will be postponed. Amendment No. 18 Offered by Ms. Waters The Acting CHAIR. It…





