last fall, Members of Congress from both parties worked with the administration and drafted a bipartisan agreement on what we could and what we could not do regarding national testing. Since then, there has been no evidence that the administration or any of the agencies named in that agreement have broken the agreement. Yet here we are, Mr. Chairman, not 3 months later, after putting the agreement together, debating again the development of national tests. I cannot help but believe that this legislation is motivated more by political urgency than by any real need. I hope that my colleagues will join me in putting the partisan politics aside. Vote ``no'' on H.R. 2846 and let us get to work on what we really need to do on reducing crowded classrooms, training more teachers, building new schools, and helping all of our children achieve high standards.
Lynn C. Woolsey: “last fall, Members of Congress from both parties worked with the administration and drafted a bipartisan agreement on…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about national testing legislation and urging bipartisan cooperation.
Share
More from Lynn C. Woolsey
I feel like you are giving us information that isn't based on politics. It is based on science and on observation.
We know that the smelt has its place in the ecosystem and that, yes, indeed Southern California needs water.
Next week, more than 20,000 delegates from around the world will convene in Washington for the International AIDS Conference. I find it ironic and a little bit sad that, as so many mobilize to fight this deadly epidemic, the majority in…
There was a very compelling op-ed piece in The Washington Post last week by U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, Ryan Crocker. In it, he paid tribute to the many American civilians who are risking their lives doing important humanitarian work…





