sequestration, if military personnel costs are exempt, could hit an across-the-board cut in defense programs of as much as 23 percent in fiscal year 2013
The President's and Department of Defense's (DOD) 2012 Strategic Guidance states the military will defend U.S. territory...
Facing such large reductions, we would have to reduce the size of the military sharply.
It is a distinct privilege and honor to have the opportunity to appear before this subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
I think we have a responsibility, obviously, to protect the strongest military in the world, and to help defend this country.
that represents the potential for another Pearl Harbor, as far as the kind of attack that we could be the target of, using cyber.
if we repeated the mistake of not paying for the war that we decide to engage in, whatever that might be, the result would be that you would...
I think I've been able to reassure our allies and partners, that we have a strategy-based approach to dealing with national security.
I think there has to be a greater sense of urgency with regards to the cyber potential, not only now, but in the future.
I appreciate your leadership on this issue.
The sequester would be entirely unacceptable.