Senator Moseley-Braun, Senator D'Amato, and I are submitting this amendment on military arsenals because we question the permissiveness of the language in section 3051 of S. 1587. While we understand the Section 800 Panel looked at the arsenal laws for the Army, Navy, and Air Force and decided to consolidate the language, there is a valid reason why the regulations evolved differently over the years. The Navy and the Air Force do not rely as heavily on arsenals as the Army does. The Army is the biggest user of our country's arsenals and owns most of them. Therefore, Congress should support the full utilization of these taxpayer-owned assets. By eliminating the language of section 3051, we wish to ensure that the military services maintain our arsenal infrastructure while at the same time giving them the flexibility to shop around for the best value.
Lateefah Simon: “Senator Moseley-Braun, Senator D'Amato, and I are submitting this amendment on military arsenals because we question the…”
On the recordJune 7, 1994
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment on military arsenals during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Lateefah Simon
Mar 4, 2025
they’re cheating Americans out of a functioning budget…willing to cut cancer research…school classrooms with 60 kindergarteners.
Jun 3, 2025
As the first congenitally blind person to serve in the United States Congress, I am honored to rise today in support of this bipartisan bill with Representative Stauber, the ThinkDIFFERENTLY About Disability Employment Act. The disability…
Sep 30, 1996
I have to tell you I do not know much about the history of this at all other than I know we are injecting ourselves into this labor-management dispute, which we should not be doing.





