On the recordJune 11, 1996
I am going to join Senator Exon in opposing this budget resolution for several reasons. First, we have tax cuts in here. Now, I recognize that leadership of both parties is saying we ought to go ahead with a tax cut. I do not think it makes any sense whatsoever when we have a deficit. It is like when we say we are going to have a 7-year glidepath to a balanced budget, but we are going to start off with a tax cut. That is like having a New Year's resolution that you are going to diet and then you start off with a great big dessert. It is not a very propitious way of doing it. And both parties are saving the tough things, the tough decisions, to the end of the 7 years. That is why we need the constitutional amendment for a balanced budget, in order to really move in that direction. Second, in the area of defense, the conference is $11.3 billion over what the Pentagon requested. No other agency gets more than they request, but the Defense Department does. I think it is unrealistic.
Source
govinfo.gov




