the National Security Education Program has been temporarily suspended. The consequence is that an estimated 324 U.S. graduate and undergraduate student finalists are anxiously waiting to hear whether they will be able to study and conduct research in critical national security areas of the world. These students are waiting because a change in the service obligation was attached to the FY 1996 Defense Appropriations Bill to require NSEP award recipients to "be employed by the Department of Defense or in the Intelligence Community." Previously, students could fulfill this requirement by working in any branch of the federal government or higher education. The current service obligation is unworkable. However, I agree that there should be a return of investment to the Department of Defense for its support of the National Security Education Program. To this end I am offering an amendment that will improve this program by better targeting the service obligation to meet national security needs and to increase program accountability. The continuation of the National Security Education Program is vital to fill the existing gap in America for linguists and country specialists in critical areas of national security.
Lateefah Simon: “the National Security Education Program has been temporarily suspended. The consequence is that an estimated 324 U.S.…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the suspension of the National Security Education Program and its impact on students.
Share
More from Lateefah Simon
Senator Murkowski has been one of the leaders in trying to fashion responsible policies toward North Korea. The one area in the world where you have more troops facing each other, with virtually no contact between the two sides in terms of…
I rise today to address the House to highlight my support of Head Start. I most recently visited an organization in my district called the Unity Council that serves families, parents, seniors, and children, providing them with affordable…
I have to tell you I do not know much about the history of this at all other than I know we are injecting ourselves into this labor-management dispute, which we should not be doing.
While I would differ with her characterization of President Clinton's posture, her praise for Senator Lott as majority leader is right on target. I had the privilege of serving with Trent Lott in the House and now here in the Senate. When…





