today I submit an amendment that I plan to offer to S. 652, the telecommunications bill next week. The amendment will ensure that when the Regional Bell Operating Companies enter the business of manufacturing, the consumer will be protected against possible price increases as a result of cross-subsidization and self-dealing. While some of us may disagree on the wisdom of allowing the Bell companies into manufacturing, no one should disagree on the need to ensure the consumer is protected against possible rate increases. I applaud the authors of the legislation for including certain safeguards already in the legislation. My amendment would take these protections one step further by requiring an audit conducted at the direction of the State. The language, which is based on last year's telecommunications bill, is simple and straightforward. I hope that my colleagues will agree and adopt this important amendment.
Lateefah Simon: “today I submit an amendment that I plan to offer to S. 652, the telecommunications bill next week. The amendment will…”
Editor's note · Context
Introducing an amendment to the telecommunications bill to protect consumers from price increases.
Share
More from Lateefah Simon
Every child deserves the chance to safely be their most authentic self at school.
I have to tell you I do not know much about the history of this at all other than I know we are injecting ourselves into this labor-management dispute, which we should not be doing.
They’re cheating Americans out of a functioning budget…willing to cut cancer research…school classrooms with 60 kindergarteners.
But what we are doing in this labor-management provision is bypassing the committee of jurisdiction. I remind the Senator from Arizona--I do not think he was here when I mentioned it--this particular amendment was tried on the…





