I have long been concerned with how EPA conducts its cost-benefit analysis to justify its rulemaking. This is something that the committee has discussed with EPA on a number of occasions, and the Supreme Court recently ruled that EPA's approach to examining costs and their regulation was flawed. The administration's revised estimates for the social cost of carbon help justify on paper larger benefits from reducing carbon emissions in any proposed rule. If the administration can inflate the price tag so that the benefits always exceed the costs, the administration can goldplate requirement regulations from any department or any agency. Section 437 says that the administration should convene a working group to revise the estimates in a more transparent manner and to make that information available to the public. I oppose the gentleman's amendment, and I urge my colleagues to vote ``no.'' I reserve the balance of my time. {time} 1600
Share & report
More from Ken Calvert
I thank the gentleman for his comments. I urge adoption of the package, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert). The en…
I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chair, I have no other speakers, and I yield back the balance of my time.
These are noncontroversial, bipartisan amendments supported by both sides. I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chair, I support this amendment. It contains, once again, bipartisan amendments that Members on both sides have…
The House was excluded from all negotiations regarding the Senate supplemental, and today we are talking about assistance to Israel that is needed immediately. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr…





