With the change of administrations, we were able to reduce the number of issues addressed in this bill, but some issues warrant continued congressional attention. WOTUS is one of them. Deciding how water is used should be the responsibility of State and local officials who are familiar with the people and the local issues. Under the WOTUS rule, however, the reach of the Federal jurisdiction would be so broad that it would significantly restrict a landowner's ability to make decisions about their property and a local government's right to plan for its own development. The language in the underlying bill simply repeals the misguided WOTUS rule and clarifies what rules will be in effect until a new rule is finalized, specifically, the same rules that were in effect immediately prior to the promulgation of the final WOTUS rule. WOTUS is an issue that warrants continued congressional attention and the provision in the underlying bill is the appropriate action to take. For these reasons, I must urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Ken Calvert
As the designee of the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Granger), I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 minutes.
I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 5692, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 730, the previous question is ordered on the bill. The question is on the engrossment and third…
I thank Chairman Mike Rogers for his leadership and for including language to improve the safety of U.S. servicemembers in the NDAA. My provision would establish new Joint Safety Council requirements for each military branch to develop a…
I claim time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 minutes.





