I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriations bill shall not be in order if changing existing law.'' The amendment requires a new determination. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order? If not, the Chair will rule. The Chair finds that this amendment includes language requiring a new determination as to whether a rule ``follows'' a specified Environmental Impact Statement. The amendment, therefore, constitutes legislation in violation of clause 2 of rule XXI. The point of order is sustained, and the amendment is not in order. Amendment Offered by Mr. Rice of South Carolina
Share & report
More from Ken Calvert
The folks that believe in genocide is Hamas. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Diaz-Balart), the Chairman of the State and Foreign Operations Subcommittee.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 427, nays 2, not voting 2, as follows: [Roll No. 36] YEAS--427 Adams Aderholt Aguilar Alford Allen Allred Amo…
I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time to close. This bill provides urgently needed humanitarian aid for millions of civilians who have been caught in the crossfire across many…
May I inquire how much time is remaining on both sides. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Ellzey). The gentleman from California has 30 seconds remaining. The gentlewoman from Connecticut has 2 minutes remaining.





