This decision would increase child poverty. It would increase the strain on the social safety net. And it would make it more difficult for these lower income women to be able to pursue their education, to be able to get promoted at work. It would make it harder for them to feed the children that they already have.
Katie Porter discusses the economic implications of the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, emphasizing its impact on child poverty and women's ability to support their families.
Share
More from Katie Porter
I was unable to be present to cast my vote on Roll Call No. 492. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA. ____________________
I was unable to be present to cast my vote on Roll Call Nos. 480, 481, 482, and 483 today. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 480, YEA on Roll Call No. 481, NAY on Roll Call No. 482, and NO on Roll Call No. 483…
I am certain that we in California have an argument why we need to do this because everywhere I go, people are saying we have to stop Trump.
Other voices in this conversation
