I think we ought to make clear that the preclusion of judicial review goes to reviewing the impact analysis. It does not affect anything else. In addition, we ought to be clear that the impact analysis is not something that is kept internal to the agency. That document is made public so that the private landowner would know exactly what is in it.
Discussing the preclusion of judicial review and the public nature of impact analysis.
Share
More from Katie Porter
I was unable to be present to cast my vote on Roll Call Nos. 502, 503, 504, and 505 today. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call Nos. 502, 503, 504, and 505. ____________________
If Vice President Harris were to choose to run, I am certain that that would have a near field-clearing effect on the Democratic side.
I was unable to be present to cast my votes on Roll Call Nos. 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490 and 491. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 484, YEA on Roll Call No. 485, YEA on Roll Call No. 486, YEA on Roll Call…
Other voices in this conversation
