despite the need to make very deep cuts in spending in this bill and despite a budget resolution that would have made very deep cuts in funding for the National Institutes of Health, 80 percent of whose money goes to local academic medical research centers all across America, we raised funding for NIH by 5.7 percent. This increase occurred while everything else in the bill was being cut. Last year we increased NIH by 7.5 percent and this year increased it by 6 percent. The increases for the National Cancer Institute were higher than the NIH average and we have placed biomedical research at a very, very high priority in crafting the Labor-HHS bill. I hope at the end of this process we will all have looked back on the process and said it was done in a fair way, it was done in a way that gave us an opportunity to participate and that we can live with the result.
Katie Porter: “despite the need to make very deep cuts in spending in this bill and despite a budget resolution that would have made…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding increases for the National Institutes of Health during a House debate.
Share
More from Katie Porter
I was unable to be present to cast my votes on Roll Call Nos. 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490 and 491. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 484, YEA on Roll Call No. 485, YEA on Roll Call No. 486, YEA on Roll Call…
Had I been present, I would have voted AYE on Roll Call No. 470. Amendment No. 2 Offered by Mr. Grijalva The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote on amendment No. 2, printed in House Report 118-754…
This amendment was summarized by Republicans as requiring the regional foresters to develop plans for the treatment and removal of dead or dying trees due to insect disease. However, I want to clarify that this amendment actually doesn't…
What we need is new ideas, a willingness to take on dangerous leaders and their corrupt enablers.





