On the recordDecember 9, 2020
If Mitch McConnell's rule were to go forward, then companies would not have to provide PPE. They wouldn't have to follow state public health guidelines.
Source
msnbc.comKatie Porter: “If Mitch McConnell's rule were to go forward, then companies would not have to provide PPE. They wouldn't have to follow…”
Editor's note · Context
Katie Porter explains the implications of Mitch McConnell's proposed legislation on workplace safety and liability.
Share
More from Katie Porter
Dec 16, 2024
I was unable to be present to cast my vote on Roll Call Nos. 502, 503, 504, and 505 today. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call Nos. 502, 503, 504, and 505. ____________________
Dec 9, 2024
Republicans, Democrats, Independents, we are all seeing people use mail-in ballots and they all deserve peace of mind that their ballots got delivered safely and quickly.
Sep 24, 2024
I am not opposed to this amendment, but I remain opposed to the underlying bill, which is filled with environmental poison pills and which the administration has warned us is so poorly drafted that they do not and will not know how to…
Nov 19, 2024
Had I been present, I would have voted AYE on Roll Call No. 470. Amendment No. 2 Offered by Mr. Grijalva The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote on amendment No. 2, printed in House Report 118-754…
Other voices in this conversation
