We have before us a very, very important issue. It is a national security issue. My good friend from San Diego spoke to one part of our Nation's security, and that is the ability of this Nation to move its interests around the world not…

if you are flying this UAS near a significant airport, a hub airport or a sub-hub airport, you are violating the law, and you are subject to a fine or even jail time.

Why don't we just simply say, 'All of these UAS must be registered, held by the manufacturer or the seller of that, and the Government has the ability to access that under circumstances relating to an accident or some other incident'?

it is a fool's errand to base all of this analysis on the appropriation level rather than on what it would cost to do the process.

Did you consider the use of existing Fast Reactor technology, such as the Russian BN-800, when doing your analysis of Advanced Disposition Reactors? If not, why not?

I am surprised you don't know.

So we actually had the technology. Is that technology in existence today?

Is that correct? It doesn't exist for this purpose.

I can't wait to invite my colleagues to visit the mixed oxide fuel facility, MOX facility.

It seems to me we don't need a Government registration program, but we need the Government to be able to access the registration program that the manufacturers probably already have.

I find that unacceptable.

You have been a leader on these issues for many, many years and certainly in your territory of Ohio. You saw what happened when the manufacturing plants left; but they are coming back, and we can make policy to do that. I think you may…