achieving Government mandated health coverage such as advocated by President Clinton and others will require a Government intrusion into the lives of both employers and individuals. Implementing such a mandate will require the Government to make insurance affordable by rationing health care and imposing price controls. Price controls will lead to higher taxes, bigger deficits, and health care rationing. Employer mandates and mandatory health alliances will have a significantly negative impact on jobs and on the character and quality of our health care. We should focus our effort instead on reforming the current system rather than creating a new Government bureaucracy. Our goal, as policymakers, ought not to be to mandate insurance coverage for everyone, rather it ought to be to make sure that all Americans are guaranteed access to health insurance, making that access as easy and consumer friendly as possible within our means.
Editor's note · Context
Speaker Doolittle discusses the implications of government-mandated health coverage.
Share
More from John Doolittle
I shall do so. I just want to observe that of this so- called 37 million who are uninsured, less than 4 percent are uninsured for more than 2 years. By the way, this is, generally speaking, a very health group, because only 2 percent of…
according to news reports, the President and the First Lady paid back over $14 thousand in back taxes, interest, and penalties owed to the Federal Government since 1980. Apparently, during the so-called decade of greed, the Clintons were…
I rise to oppose this rule. It would appear that many Members of this House are unaware that murder, assault, vandalism and trespassing are presently illegal. I bring this up because we have a bill whose advocates insist will provide for…
Well, I interrupted the gentleman, but I appreciate the elaboration on those two points. What other features does this plan have that smack of socialized medicine?





