I rise to oppose this rule. It would appear that many Members of this House are unaware that murder, assault, vandalism and trespassing are presently illegal. I bring this up because we have a bill whose advocates insist will provide for the safety of those that patronize abortion clinics. No one is fooled by the real intent of this bill. The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act seeks to strip those who are prolife of their freedom of speech. In essence the proponents of this bill are saying that free speech is good as long as you share their ideological beliefs. The sponsors of this bill are willing to subordinate rights guaranteed by the Constitution to further their proabortion agenda. This legislation starts us in a very dangerous course, Mr. Speaker, away from essential civil liberties. I urge Members to oppose the rule, and I hope in the debates that follow we can get out some more information about it.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act during House floor debate.
Share
More from John Doolittle
according to news reports, the President and the First Lady paid back over $14 thousand in back taxes, interest, and penalties owed to the Federal Government since 1980. Apparently, during the so-called decade of greed, the Clintons were…
yesterday, the chairman of the House Banking Committee, in answer to the question, ``Will hearings be held on the Madison Guaranty Saving And Loan affair?'' replied, ``Yes, they will.'' That was the first good bit of news we have heard so…
as a Californian I support the need for earthquake relief. But as an American, I believe that we must provide this relief by making offsetting cuts, not by piling on further debt onto the backs of every man, woman, and child in California…
The President claims that this is a simple plan. I would just say to the gentleman that I have got the bill. It looks like we have in this bill 1,364 pages. I have read this. Some of this is the most convoluted material I have ever read in…





