Then I am sure if the gentleman goes over every single one, he can answer the questions, what investigations, what research has been done to determine that this technology is effective and is worth $2 million of taxpayers' funds? If you investigate every earmark, I have a couple of other questions. Sherwin-Williams is not the only maker of paint in the country. How did we know, and what was determined that Sherwin-Williams was the best or the right supplier, if you assume that the military asked for it and the technology was effective?
John Campbell: “Then I am sure if the gentleman goes over every single one, he can answer the questions, what investigations, what…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the effectiveness and procurement process of military technology funding.
Share
More from John Campbell
I applaud those words. I applaud the basis upon which this council was established.
That's absolutely right. And again, as I pointed out, the Democrats who came into power, many of them campaigned and made a big deal about, their issues were, that they would, wanted a balanced budget, wanted to move towards a balanced…
this particular earmark is for a swimmer detection sonar network for $1.5 million. The company developing this technology is in New Hampshire. Interestingly, there are about three other companies that do a similar technology or do…
I stand here in front of this chart which says that gasoline is $4.09, which is the national average. As my friend indicated, I'm from California. I can tell you that this last weekend when I was home I paid $4.91 for premium unleaded. In…





