this particular earmark is for a swimmer detection sonar network for $1.5 million. The company developing this technology is in New Hampshire. Interestingly, there are about three other companies that do a similar technology or do something intended to do the same thing, which is detect people swimming in the water up towards a ship, at least three others that we have determined, and one of which is currently being used by the Coast Guard that doesn't use sonar but already is in place and in effect. Mr. Chairman, I could ask the same series of questions of the chairman of the committee on this earmark that I did on the last. I won't do that, because the point of this, frankly, is not that this particular earmark is particularly egregious, nor, frankly, that the previous one that I brought up was particularly egregious. I believe that there are literally hundreds of earmarks like these offered by many members in this Defense Appropriations Committee.
John Campbell: “this particular earmark is for a swimmer detection sonar network for $1.5 million. The company developing this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing earmarks related to defense appropriations and technology development.
Share
More from John Campbell
I guess this afternoon I am going to be a fairly lonely voice in opposition to this bipartisan agreement, and I hope that my colleagues on both sides of the aisle will listen as in the next 3 minutes I present to you five reasons why I…
you know, I find this whole debate rather perplexing. What the majority party is saying is that in order to leave people's taxes the same, in order to leave them where they are now, they have to raise taxes on somebody else. They have to…
Proposals to help home buyers - whether it's this 50-year mortgage or whether it's Kamala Harris's proposal in her presidential campaign to give money to first time homebuyers - the main beneficiaries are actually the people selling houses.
I rise today to ask that while the House consider this energy legislation, that they take into account that the CAFE provision in this bill does nothing to clarify the critical issue of which federal government agency has the lead on…





