This is an earmark ostensibly for a ``Paint Shield for Protecting People Against Microbial Threats'' for $2 million. Apparently this $2 million will be going to the Sherwin-Williams paint company in Cleveland, Ohio. I actually have a couple of questions either for the sponsor of the earmark or for the chairman of the committee. I guess my first question would be, and I am happy to yield to whomever would like to answer it, is this something that military leadership has asked for?
John Campbell: “This is an earmark ostensibly for a ``Paint Shield for Protecting People Against Microbial Threats'' for $2 million.…”
On the recordAugust 4, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning a $2 million earmark for a paint company related to microbial threats.
Share
More from John Campbell
Aug 4, 2007
Well, I think Sherwin-Williams thinks there is, by the way. Then the final question I would have for the gentleman would be if this $2 million goes to Sherwin-Williams to develop this product, and they, in fact, develop it, will the…
Aug 4, 2007
Let me ask, though, but then why is it, if they are competitively bid, that this one is going to Sherwin- Williams paint company?
Sep 25, 2007
I applaud those words. I applaud the basis upon which this council was established.
Dec 18, 2007
I think what we have reached here is an effective compromise. People will be able to buy cars and trucks if they want. But we will also be moving fuel economy forward.





