If you already established it as a cut below last year's level, then yes, it is. But I would ask the gentleman that, is the gentleman proposing to increase the deficit, which, with this amendment, the deficit would go down and taxpayers would have more money?
John Campbell: “If you already established it as a cut below last year's level, then yes, it is. But I would ask the gentleman that, is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of an amendment on the deficit and taxpayers during a debate.
Share
More from John Campbell
What evidence of that is there, if I may ask? What do the taxpayers get for this $2 million as evidence of their ownership of this product or technology?
Yes, we have had increased tax revenues every year. In fact, all but one year out of the last 4 years it has been double digits, in other words, 10 percent or more. That's pretty good. I think a lot of Americans out there would love to see…
Proposals to help home buyers - whether it's this 50-year mortgage or whether it's Kamala Harris's proposal in her presidential campaign to give money to first time homebuyers - the main beneficiaries are actually the people selling houses.
I applaud those words. I applaud the basis upon which this council was established.





