We are qualified by virtue of the fact that we have been elected by people in our districts to be stewards of their money. As I said, this is not a question of whether or not these things have academic merit within a field of academics. It is a question of whether they are worthy of spending taxpayer money in that area. I think they are not.
John Campbell: “We are qualified by virtue of the fact that we have been elected by people in our districts to be stewards of their…”
On the recordMay 2, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the allocation of taxpayer money during a debate.
Share
More from John Campbell
Nov 4, 2010
Mr. Speaker, I would ask you and I would ask the President, where are the jobs you promised?
Dec 18, 2007
I think what we have reached here is an effective compromise. People will be able to buy cars and trucks if they want. But we will also be moving fuel economy forward.
Aug 4, 2007
What evidence of that is there, if I may ask? What do the taxpayers get for this $2 million as evidence of their ownership of this product or technology?
Aug 4, 2007
Well, I think Sherwin-Williams thinks there is, by the way. Then the final question I would have for the gentleman would be if this $2 million goes to Sherwin-Williams to develop this product, and they, in fact, develop it, will the…





