The point is do we want to spend taxpayer funds on this? The United States taxpayer cannot fund every bit of academic research for every university, for everything that every professor wants to do across this country. We can't do that. The question before us is, are these the sorts of things we do want to spend taxpayer money on? I would suggest that they are not, and that is why I would suggest that to vote against this amendment is to say that you believe that taxpayer money should be spent on these specific items. That is the question before us. Not whether it is interesting. I am a Civil War buff. I love all kinds of interesting stuff about that, but I don't think the taxpayer ought to pay for research into it.
John Campbell: “The point is do we want to spend taxpayer funds on this? The United States taxpayer cannot fund every bit of academic…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the allocation of taxpayer funds for academic research.
Share
More from John Campbell
Proposals to help home buyers - whether it's this 50-year mortgage or whether it's Kamala Harris's proposal in her presidential campaign to give money to first time homebuyers - the main beneficiaries are actually the people selling houses.
I rise to congratulate the Orange County Water District for its 75 years of exemplary service to the communities of Orange County, California. Orange County Water District and its employees deserve special recognition for their exceptional…
That's absolutely right. And again, as I pointed out, the Democrats who came into power, many of them campaigned and made a big deal about, their issues were, that they would, wanted a balanced budget, wanted to move towards a balanced…
Let me ask, though, but then why is it, if they are competitively bid, that this one is going to Sherwin- Williams paint company?





