I think this discussion we are having right now gets to the core of the difference between what Democrats in Washington, how they look at things and how we Republicans in Washington look at things. They look at it from the sense of, well, if we don't raise these taxes, how is the government going to spend more money on this or spend more money on that, or how are they going to get to take that? Because that is what it amounts to. When you tax everybody else, you come here, the 435 of us, plus the 100 people in the other body, get to spend the money on the stuff they want to spend it on. And so how can we spend that money if we don't do this? You and I, Mr. Garrett, look at it from the standpoint of families, of taxpayers, of people. What are they not going to be able to do in New Jersey with that almost $350 a month? I mean, that is a nice car payment. That is substantial child care. That is a chunk of a house payment. It is a lot of different things to a lot of people. And we look at everything from the sense of the family, the taxpayer. They come first and the government comes second. That is not the way the Democrats in this town look at it, is it?
John Campbell: “I think this discussion we are having right now gets to the core of the difference between what Democrats in Washington…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the differing perspectives of Democrats and Republicans on taxation and government spending.
Share
More from John Campbell
I rise to congratulate the Orange County Water District for its 75 years of exemplary service to the communities of Orange County, California. Orange County Water District and its employees deserve special recognition for their exceptional…
Mr. Speaker, I would ask you and I would ask the President, where are the jobs you promised?
You know, Mr. Speaker, the original intent of why we allow gambling on Indian reservations was so that we could give some economic opportunity to full-blooded Indians on their native tribal lands in very remote areas in which hardly any…
Well, I think Sherwin-Williams thinks there is, by the way. Then the final question I would have for the gentleman would be if this $2 million goes to Sherwin-Williams to develop this product, and they, in fact, develop it, will the…





