This House can do better than this earmark process. We can do better than what is going on. Their earmarks have led to some of our colleagues who are now in jail. It has led to other problems with other colleagues. Let's reform it or get rid of it. This amendment is the beginning of that process. And Mr. Chairman, I would urge Members, even if they have earmarks in this bill, to support the beginning of reform or elimination of what has hurt this institution and has hurt taxpayers so much.
John Campbell: “This House can do better than this earmark process. We can do better than what is going on. Their earmarks have led to…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for reform of the earmark process during a House debate.
Share
More from John Campbell
Well, I think Sherwin-Williams thinks there is, by the way. Then the final question I would have for the gentleman would be if this $2 million goes to Sherwin-Williams to develop this product, and they, in fact, develop it, will the…
I rise to congratulate the Orange County Water District for its 75 years of exemplary service to the communities of Orange County, California. Orange County Water District and its employees deserve special recognition for their exceptional…
Proposals to help home buyers - whether it's this 50-year mortgage or whether it's Kamala Harris's proposal in her presidential campaign to give money to first time homebuyers - the main beneficiaries are actually the people selling houses.
That's absolutely right. And again, as I pointed out, the Democrats who came into power, many of them campaigned and made a big deal about, their issues were, that they would, wanted a balanced budget, wanted to move towards a balanced…





