I rise also to support the Section 8 Voucher Reform Act of 2007. I want to thank my good friend from California, Chairman Maxine Waters, for sponsoring this vital legislation. I also want to thank our chair, Chairman Frank, for his leadership and guidance in this committee. Mr. Chairman, in 2004, when the administration decided to change the funding formula for section 8 vouchers, drastic cuts were made to the number of vouchers available. These cuts hurt needy families throughout the Nation and throughout my district. We are talking about seniors, low-income families, disabled, the poor, the disadvantaged. In my district alone, section 8 housing vouchers, public housing units, provide affordable housing for more than 32,000 people. Can you imagine, 32,000 people right now, children and others, that would not have a home, not have a place to rent, that would be homeless if it hadn't been for section 8? This bill reverses the cut and adds an additional 20,000 vouchers so that families are not forced to choose between paying for food, their medication or rent. We are talking about people that can't afford housing, even right now, with the inflation and the cost that is going on right now. We have got to make sure that they have a home, they have stability, and they have a roof over their head, especially for our children.
Joe Baca: “I rise also to support the Section 8 Voucher Reform Act of 2007. I want to thank my good friend from California…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the Section 8 Voucher Reform Act of 2007 during House floor debate.
Share
More from Joe Baca
That is why the Frank-Dodd legislation came into existence, to make sure that we had a lot more oversight and accountability.
The American people need a tax plan that will help grow the middle class and create jobs right here in the United States. The American people want jobs to take care of their families. Sadly, the Republicans are holding the tax breaks for…
I believe this is an area that we can dissuade many that believe bipartisanship is not truly available and does not truly happen, because it does.
It seems like from the other side of the aisle they want less regulations, but we have to keep in mind that the regulations are good because we have to protect the consumer and the stockholders.





