Americans see that personal gifts to justices from right-wing billionaires sugar daddies, like Harlan Crow, and Federalist Society dark money expenditures are fundamentally perverting judicial ethics and undermining justice and the rule of…

When right-wing billionaires create conflicts of interest for the highest court in our country, they are completely silent.

The real problem is that giant corporations are harmed when Americans, injured by toxic torts or environmental crimes, receive contributions from donors to help them bring personal injury or class action lawsuits.

We must do more to bolster the integrity of the Supreme Court.

I am more than happy to listen to the cries of judicial activism, but we can no longer sit here and just pick when we like it and when we do not because it fits the politics of our time or the narrative that we are interested in.

A poor person who has never met a judge must be treated the same by the courts as Harlan Crow.

I mean, do they really not know that Jared Kushner took $2 billion from the Saudis?

And I just think that the American people recognize that they have no credibility.

I think it is really important to say very clearly. We do have, of course, one Majority witness that stated clearly that they think the violent regime change is the only way to deal with Iran, and, in fact, that we know that is not the…

Big corporations, as we all know, are doing just fine. Meanwhile, Republicans are willfully ignoring the fact that wealthy conservative donors are lavishing gifts on the conservative Justices of the Supreme Court.

But today's hearing is like most of the Majority's investigations and hearings: a lot of allegations, zero proof, no receipts.

Now, keep in mind there has been no evidence of any wrongdoing or transactions of the person that is actually in government, Joe Biden.

Whistleblower allegations should be taken seriously, period.

I was not recorded on rollcall No. 295. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 295. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that the…

This is a bill that is bipartisan. I was the first one to introduce a post-office-naming bill in this Congress.

I think that, first, so I have a situation in my district, which I explained to you.

My colleagues on the other side of the aisle, the Republican Majority, is talking about controlling drug pricing and drug costs for the American people.

A Republican default would be devastating, and all this talk about controlling drug costs will be for naught.

Is bad enough that they have such monopolistic or oligopolistic control that they influence prices.

A Republican default on the national debt would be a tragedy that we would be feeling for months, if not years.

The Inflation Reduction Act capped out-of-pocket costs for patients covered by Medicare Part D at $2,000 per year.

If they want to help reduce drug costs, pass a clean debt ceiling limit increase.

For far too long, Americans have paid too much for lifesaving prescription drugs.

I was not recorded on rollcall vote No. 213 and rollcall vote No. 214. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 213 and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 214. ____________________

I think there should be broad agreement. We shouldn't ban books.