I must say the point the gentleman is making is an important point. This is precisely the point that caused these Members who represent the desert to object so strenuously to the fact that the chairman of the full committee, the night before the full committee markup brought in a substitute that was his substitute without benefit of these Members seeing it beforehand. Rather than having the subcommittee deal with complex details like this, he chose to arbitrarily deal with it in the full committee. I would submit the least that could have happened with 14 new Members on your committee, that you could have had a subcommittee hearings on this process during this session of the Congress.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about committee procedures and member involvement during a markup.
Share
More from Jerry Lewis
I have one very brief question. In this committee that operates in such a democratic fashion (small d; big D perhaps) just how frequently has there been a discharge of a measure of this significance in the full committee without a…
the outdoor experience in the desert is a far cry from taking a walk through a wilderness area along a scenic trail or a mountain stream. The desert environment is often very unforgiving. Indeed, it can be deadly without an adequate water…
today I would like to bring to your attention the grave injustices suffered by the Armenian people at the hands of the Ottoman Turkish Empire earlier this century. On April 24, 1994 at the Armenian Genocide Monument located in Montebello's…
Is it accurate to say that a significant number of the votes on this bill in committee were ghost votes, the Members were not even present to vote?





