It is very important the membership understand, but especially the membership of the Committee on Armed Services and the appropriate Appropriations subcommittees, there is little doubt that there is serious potential impact to our ability to prepare for the national defense in this bill. It is my view this bill should have been designed in a fashion to deal with those questions straightforward, that is, in the bill, so it would have gone to the Committee on Armed Services. There is no question it was designed to bypass that committee in terms of this debate. It is very important that the membership know that we need to look at this very carefully.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about national defense implications in a bill before the Committee on Armed Services.
Share
More from Jerry Lewis
It is apparent to the membership that this vast area has huge potential in terms of activity that involves flight and overflight, very important to the military. This is territory where the stealth airplanes fly, for example. What kinds of…
Mr. Chairman, frankly I was a little disconcerted there a moment ago, for throughout this debate I have been wanting to mention the name of California's senior Senator, Mrs. Feinstein from California, but I did not think our rules allowed…
today I would like to bring to your attention the grave injustices suffered by the Armenian people at the hands of the Ottoman Turkish Empire earlier this century. On April 24, 1994 at the Armenian Genocide Monument located in Montebello's…
I rise in favor of the amendment. Mr. Chairman, this is going to be an extended discussion, probably over several days, regarding this desert wilderness and park bill. Fundamental to the discussion that we are going to have relative to the…





