Mr. Speaker, the process we have just gone through where we had a vote whereby a significant majority voted to overrule the ruling of the Chair would suggest to me it is very important at the highest level our leadership come together from both sides of the aisle and discuss how this kind of thing can happen in the House. It is not good for the body. It does not allow us to go forward with our work effectively.
Jerry Lewis: “Mr. Speaker, the process we have just gone through where we had a vote whereby a significant majority voted to overrule…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for bipartisan leadership discussions after a significant vote in the House.
Share
More from Jerry Lewis
This program will cost about $30 billion if it follows that path. Yet despite pledges in this House to adhere to the letter and spirit of PAYGO, this bill does neither. Our colleagues' argument is that today's economic conditions…
It is a fabulous program, using the money very well, and I urge a ``no'' vote on the gentleman's amendment.
I very much appreciate your taking the time to make those expressions. They've done a fabulous job on this bill, and it's an illustration of what can happen when we work so well together.
But in the meantime, we are talking about regular order, trying to change the appropriations process so it makes sense, not destroy our committee. I would suggest we are on a pathway to destroy this committee.





