Mr. Speaker, I think the House should know that this motion to instruct does involve a number of very important policy areas, instructing the House to take action as conferees dealing with the other body. In the area of mental parity, for example, there are some very real costs that are involved. While in the 1997 year those costs are difficult to measure over a period of 5 years, there will be an absolute cost of somewhere near 550 millions of dollars. That would be a cost obligation extended forward without any discussions at the authorizing committee level, and without any real debate or light of day in terms of the pros and cons related to that very important subject area. As we deal with questions that relate to the newborn, a similar problem. These are issues that through the appropriate authorizing committees could very well have been discussed thoroughly. But suddenly in this motion to instruct we have a package here that, over time, is going to cost a minimum of $110 million. We have identified ways to pay for it without any kind of thorough review. One of the suggestions, as indicated by the other body, is that we might sell Governor's Island, a little spot in New York that is of interest to some of my colleagues.
Jerry Lewis: “Mr. Speaker, I think the House should know that this motion to instruct does involve a number of very important policy…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a motion to instruct related to mental health and newborn issues.
Share
More from Jerry Lewis
title II of the bill requires HUD to rescind $1.3 billion in the funds that the Congress provided in 2007 or prior years. Frankly, HUD cannot meet this rescission without doing great harm to the most vulnerable of our population, those…
I just might mention that during the time that the chairman and I have worked together in the Appropriations Committee, we have talked many a time about process where we both happen to think it is very important. But the fact is that all…
It's my understanding that by considering the supplemental in this way, under this rather unorthodox way, the majority's new rule that's related to earmarks does not apply to the two amendments we're considering today.
I have only one good thing to say about the Democrat majority's budget resolution. Unlike the only other budget-related legislation considered by the House this year, at least this resolution, the budget resolution, follows regular order…





