Mr. Chairman, I might mention at the tail end of that discussion between the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Dingell] and the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Oxley] that we are allocated only so many dollars within our bill, very difficult dollars to stretch among these various accounts. This specific proposal would be a budget buster insofar as our bill is concerned. We are talking about approximately $89 million in outlay. We would be short if this amendment were to become law. I strongly urge the membership to refuse this additional allocation and recognize the bill does have to stay within its outlay targets. I ask for a ``no'' vote.
Jerry Lewis: “Mr. Chairman, I might mention at the tail end of that discussion between the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Dingell] and…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing budget concerns related to a proposed amendment during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Jerry Lewis
It is a fabulous program, using the money very well, and I urge a ``no'' vote on the gentleman's amendment.
I can't help but wonder if maybe there is some lack of commitment to regular order that I had never perceived before. For example, my colleague from San Diego, the chairman of the VA Subcommittee, if he had been given an opportunity, could…
I very much appreciate our chairman yielding. I, too, want to express our deepest gratitude to Dale Oak and his family for the years and years of work and sacrifice they have put in on our behalf. As the chairman indicated, Dale has worked…
What I am suggesting, Mr. Obey, is that there are, in this place even, there are people who sometimes use data and statistics for their purposes versus other purposes. This is our committee and I would hope we would run it in regular order.





