Indeed, with the last amendment that we passed, the Thune amendment, if we adopted this amendment, that would take the emergency account down to $700 million and put us in a position where, at the very time when America should be coming together on behalf of those people who are impacted by these floods, we would be undermining that opportunity and that responsibility by way of this amendment. So it is with great reluctance and a continuing commitment to moving towards balancing the budget, but with great reluctance, I must oppose very strongly the Neumann amendment.
Jerry Lewis: “Indeed, with the last amendment that we passed, the Thune amendment, if we adopted this amendment, that would take the…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to FEMA funding during a House Appropriations Committee discussion.
Share
More from Jerry Lewis
I very much appreciate our chairman yielding. I, too, want to express our deepest gratitude to Dale Oak and his family for the years and years of work and sacrifice they have put in on our behalf. As the chairman indicated, Dale has worked…
This program will cost about $30 billion if it follows that path. Yet despite pledges in this House to adhere to the letter and spirit of PAYGO, this bill does neither. Our colleagues' argument is that today's economic conditions…
What I am suggesting, Mr. Obey, is that there are, in this place even, there are people who sometimes use data and statistics for their purposes versus other purposes. This is our committee and I would hope we would run it in regular order.
I very much appreciate your taking the time to make those expressions. They've done a fabulous job on this bill, and it's an illustration of what can happen when we work so well together.





