Reclaiming my time and closing my remarks regarding this amendment, it is very obvious that there are two points to be made here: First to the Members of the House, if this were their district, how would they react to this treatment that is so arbitrary and capricious? First, our national defense is involved. The cutting edge of our technology is involved. I deal daily with NASA's programs, and this is absolutely ludicrous treatment of that part of the process. Above and beyond that, a Member's district who knows it best. Mr. Chairman, I would urge the Members to seriously consider how they would react to this kind of arbitrary treatment.
Jerry Lewis: “Reclaiming my time and closing my remarks regarding this amendment, it is very obvious that there are two points to be…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the treatment of national defense and technology funding during House debate.
Share
More from Jerry Lewis
It is a fabulous program, using the money very well, and I urge a ``no'' vote on the gentleman's amendment.
What I am suggesting, Mr. Obey, is that there are, in this place even, there are people who sometimes use data and statistics for their purposes versus other purposes. This is our committee and I would hope we would run it in regular order.
I very much appreciate our chairman yielding. I, too, want to express our deepest gratitude to Dale Oak and his family for the years and years of work and sacrifice they have put in on our behalf. As the chairman indicated, Dale has worked…
I just might mention that during the time that the chairman and I have worked together in the Appropriations Committee, we have talked many a time about process where we both happen to think it is very important. But the fact is that all…





