What we are doing in funding this particular program is vital to the further utilization, the development of a market, if you could use that term, for increased communication activities through the schools. Education is considered to be a major market. However, what I am afraid of is that the opposition to this stems from a feeling that the role of the Federal Government is not to assist education. I went through this in 1981, when President Reagan submitted his first budget, and NSF had some very interesting things in this area being done. They were totally eliminated. The grounds were not that they were not important, but it was not an appropriate role for the Federal Government.
Jerry Brown: “What we are doing in funding this particular program is vital to the further utilization, the development of a market…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of federal funding for education programs.
Share
More from Jerry Brown
Let me make clear tht I did not say that the gentleman's amendment was a 10 percent cut in the NSF Budget. I said that his amendment was a 10% cut in the amount of money that would otherwise go to this fine agency. His amendment is $270…
I commend the chairman, the distinguished chairman of the subcommittee, for the precise language that he has used and which I think is correct. I should point out, however, that the Senate, the other body, in its own wisdom, rejected this…
Maybe this is now the new normal and he suggested maybe climate change is exacerbating the conditions that lead to blazes like this.
Yes, if this keeps going, democracy itself, our own governing process, will begin to lose its credibility it already is. And so, it's a very dangerous tactic started by Trump. And now the little Trumps who are following.





