On the recordApril 10, 2013
So why not have a trust fund? And for that matter, why not, like the Department of Transportation, have a separate line item for the overhead expense of just having a national rail system?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Denham questions the lack of a dedicated trust fund for rail funding.
Share
More from Jeff Denham
Aug 8, 2018
Mr. Kelly, once again here when the original vote was approved as a $33 billion project and we found out just a couple years later it was a $98.5 billion project.
Jun 21, 2018
I thank the gentleman for yielding. I rise in support, not only of this rule, but on the underlying bill. It is time to get something done around here. Both parties have failed to address this issue for decades now; we finally have an…
Dec 12, 2018
I thank the gentleman for yielding and for scheduling this time for all of us to address each other, as well as address our country. I rise to express my gratitude to the men and women of California's 10th Congressional District for…
Aug 8, 2018
$10.6 billion? And while we are waiting for that funding gap to come in, whatever that new revenue is, will we have high-speed rail on that segment?
Other voices in this conversation
