Mr. Chair, the picture my friend from northern California just showed is instructive because both the right and the left side of that picture are areas that were clear-cut. You can tell that, Mr. Chair, because all the trees were exactly the same height. It is what we call a plantation forest. It is unhealthy. It is absolutely vulnerable to wildfire. I am glad that they did some thinning on the left side of that picture, but the unhealthy forest on the right side is also a vestige of clear-cutting, which does not make anyone safer. It actually makes communities a lot more vulnerable to wildfire, and it is exactly the kind of project that would go through the huge loophole created in this legislation. More clear-cutting is not going to make us any safer from wildfire risk. Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from San Diego in southern California (Mr. Peters).
Share & report
More from Jared Huffman
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from California (Mr. Harder), who is the author of this important bill.
Mr. Chairman, we were under the impression that this was essentially a closed rule. Many of our beneficial amendments were rejected out of hand or ruled out of order, but apparently, there is always room for an amendment that will make the…
Mr. Speaker, this is a great bill. I urge my colleagues to support it, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, if the excuse for this amendment is that we don't have the money, then you do an amendment to strike the whole program. You don't simply single out the parts of it that are environmental or that have to do with climate…





