Mr. Speaker, I have a couple of points. First of all, Federal wildlife managers under current law already have to follow the best available science. If they were to issue lead ammunition regulations randomly, arbitrarily, in a way that contravenes science, they would find themselves immediately in court, and those actions would be overturned. In terms of deference to State law and State wildlife managers, I certainly agree with the gentleman on that. The problem is that many States have actually taken steps to restrict lead ammunition and tackle. This bill is so poorly written that it is not clear whether Federal wildlife managers could continue to comply with those State laws or whether they would have to ignore them and continue to allow lead in those cases. Those are several reasons why this bill, in addition to the policy problems I have highlighted, is technically not ready for prime time.
Jared Huffman: “Mr. Speaker, I have a couple of points. First of all, Federal wildlife managers under current law already have to follow…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about a bill related to lead ammunition regulations and its implications for state laws.
Share
More from Jared Huffman
I can’t, in my time here in Congress, remember anything even remotely like this: watching this trusted, venerable charity organisation, the National Parks Foundation, literally be hijacked for a craven political agenda that tries to steal…
I will fight this, both for Yosemite and for every treasured park that would be up for grabs if this domino falls.
Mr. Speaker, we are on day 19 of Trump's illegal war of choice with Iran. So far, 13 American servicemembers are dead, and 200 more are wounded. Gas prices have surged 80 cents a gallon just in the last 3 weeks. Grocery bills are climbing…
in the spirit of geothermal energy, we are sure hearing a lot of hot air from the other side with this fantastical narrative that Republicans, I guess, are now lowering costs and saving healthcare. The American people can decide whether…





