We do have language in our bill that I just described, the one pending in the Energy and Commerce Committee to exempt historical lighting from the new goals. Hopefully we can invent light bulbs for historical lighting that are more efficient too, but we're trying to be reasonable here. In response to earlier comments by Mr. Peterson, the goal is to help the domestic industry be able to produce efficient lighting. And the goal is also to set tough enough standards so that we save the enormous amount of energy that Mr. Upton was just mentioning.
Jane Harman: “We do have language in our bill that I just described, the one pending in the Energy and Commerce Committee to exempt…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing energy efficiency standards for lighting in the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Share
More from Jane Harman
Absolutely, but the question we raised is whether the President's anticipated action this afternoon helps or hinders that goal.
I think Congress is AWOL and Congress should be doing this, and the 2001 AUMF that most of us who are here voted for it seems to me doesn't apply to this situation at all.
I think Congress has to enact an authorization to use military force for the region, which would identify the trade-offs and how to create a strategy for United States leadership that puts maximum pressure not just on Iran.
I think that if President Trump can reach a strong deal with the North Koreans he will deserve enormous credit.





