Political Quotes

Jane Harman: I am pleased to join in the bipartisan effort to clarify and improve upon the safe-harbor language contained in the…

On the recordMarch 8, 1995
I am pleased to join in the bipartisan effort to clarify and improve upon the safe-harbor language contained in the securities litigation reform bill. Investors, the SEC, and securities analysts all agree that forward-looking information, that is, information about a company's future prospects, is critically important to investors. Such information is particularly important to investors of high-technology, high-growth companies, whose very existence pushes the boundaries of technology that are essential to our economy's future growth. By their very nature, the statements of these companies involve a future product, innovation, or technology whose performance is subject to the vagaries of the economy. By their very definition, projections of performance are inherently uncertain and it is often inevitable that the company will fail to meet one or more analysts' expectations. When these companies fail to meet analysts' expectations, they often face abusive lawsuits, which sap resources that could otherwise be used for research, product promotion, and market development. As a consequence, corporate executives have been increasingly reluctant to make forward-looking statements.
Said by
Jane Harman
California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the importance of safe-harbor language in securities litigation reform.

Share

More from Jane Harman

May 7, 2018

I think Congress has to enact an authorization to use military force for the region, which would identify the trade-offs and how to create a strategy for United States leadership that puts maximum pressure not just on Iran.

congress.gov
May 7, 2018

But imposing sanctions and continuing to impose them on Iran's malign behavior in the region, which is permissible, is the right way to go.

congress.gov
May 7, 2018

I think it should be working, as we've all said, with Europe, who are in this deal in the first place, and hopefully with China and Russia, too, to contain nuclear developments in the region.

congress.gov
May 7, 2018

I think that the Kim regime in North Korea has regime survival as its first tenet--not helping its people but regime survival.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation