I do not think we have any further speakers on this amendment, but I would like to enter into a dialogue with the amendment's sponsor to suggest to him that we might agree by unanimous consent that the sense of Congress in his resolution be the entire resolution. We strike the findings, because our side feels that they are not complete and that some of them may be misleading. And that, as I said, on a bipartisan basis we all were wrong in 1990 when the wall came down and we expected a more peaceful world. Would the gentleman be amenable to striking the findings and having his resolution be the Sense of Congress, as he has drafted it, which I would predict would be adopted unanimously?
Jane Harman: “I do not think we have any further speakers on this amendment, but I would like to enter into a dialogue with the…”
On the recordJune 23, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Proposing changes to an amendment regarding the sense of Congress.
Share
More from Jane Harman
May 7, 2018
If you're Kim Jong-un and you're watching this and thinking oh, here was an international agreement led by the United States in which they promised to give up their nuclear program in exchange for certain things.
Jun 4, 2014
Senator McCain is right when he says Russia's economy is a gas station and Russia is a gas station posing as a country.
May 7, 2018
I think Congress has to enact an authorization to use military force for the region, which would identify the trade-offs and how to create a strategy for United States leadership that puts maximum pressure not just on Iran.





