In the Subcommittee on Military Forces and Personnel on which I and several of us who have testified for my amendment serve, four service personnel chiefs, commissioned officers, testified that they do not need a change in current law. In addition to that, the Undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness, Edwin Dorn, has sent a letter in support of my amendment, and I would just like to quote from part of it. The number of Service members with permanent medical conditions that restrict their assignments is small-- typically around two-tenths of a percent of the active force. Although these members cannot serve at certain locations, they are experienced, qualified and able to perform their required duties. They represent a considerable investment in training and an invaluable experienced resource. We developed our personnel and assignment policies to support our national objectives while providing fair treatment to the men and women who serve our nation. Your amendment provides Service Secretaries with the needed flexibility that allows us to get the greatest contribution from each of our Service members and to continue our long and proud tradition of taking care of our own. Mr. Chairman, once again, I urge support and passage of my amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to military personnel policies during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Jane Harman
I suppose, in an ironic way, Richard would smile at the enormous impact he had on friend and foe alike. He was a life force, a force of nature--someone always operating on multiple levels, in high gear, and in more than three dimensions…
I thank Chairman Reyes for yielding to me and for the nice things that he says not only about me but surely about the women and men who serve our intelligence community around the world. And I thank him for authoring this resolution. Madam…
Jack Murtha was a paradox: a big man with an impressive war record who never wavered from his commitment to the wounded, the disadvantaged, and always challenged those who, in his strong opinion, underestimated the economic and human costs…
I believe that your new legislative thrust that we are discussing today, the combination of two ideas, combines the best bipartisan ideas that we have been able to come up with in the House and in the Senate.





