The per unit cost of the C-17 or whatever it might be is lower to the U.S. Government so, bottom line, we save jobs, we save the industrial base, we lower the cost of defense purchases for the U.S. Government. For all these reasons I think this proposed change in the law is a good idea, and I oppose the amendment being offered by my very good friends over here.
Discussing the benefits of a proposed change in defense procurement law.
Share
More from Jane Harman
I think that Congress can finally construct the strategy that has been missing from everything we've been doing in the region.
Absolutely, but the question we raised is whether the President's anticipated action this afternoon helps or hinders that goal.
I think Congress is AWOL and Congress should be doing this, and the 2001 AUMF that most of us who are here voted for it seems to me doesn't apply to this situation at all.
I think that the Kim regime in North Korea has regime survival as its first tenet--not helping its people but regime survival.
Other voices in this conversation
