the per unit cost of the C-17 or whatever it might be is lower to the U.S. Government so, bottom line, we save jobs, we save the industrial base, we lower the cost of defense purchases for the U.S. Government. For all these reasons I think this proposed change in the law is a good idea, and I oppose the amendment being offered by my very good friends over here.
Discussing the benefits of a proposed change in defense procurement law.
Share
More from Jane Harman
I do think, as you said, that decertifying this deal or at least in some way pulling away from this deal is going to make it harder to negotiate with the North Koreans.
I think that the Kim regime in North Korea has regime survival as its first tenet--not helping its people but regime survival.
There will be austerity measures required to qualify for IMF loans, substantial, huge IMF loans.
Other voices in this conversation
