I speak strongly against this motion to recommit. It is redundant. We have inserted language in this bill that takes care of the problem. In the manager's amendment, language was added at the request of the Blue Dogs, and I am proud to be a co-chair of the Blue Dog Coalition, and that language specifically refers to terrorist organizations, and the Revolutionary Guards are one such organization. So I would like to say for two reasons there's no need to support this motion to recommit: one, it kills the bill by using the word 'promptly'; number two, it is redundant with excellent language that we added to the bill in the manager's amendment. As I have said before, this is not a zero sum game. We either get more of both or less of both. These amendments carefully restore, it's called the RESTORE Act, the balance of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which Congress wisely passed 20 years ago. Vote for this bill and against the motion to recommit. We will restore that balance.
Jane Harman: “I speak strongly against this motion to recommit. It is redundant. We have inserted language in this bill that takes…”
On the recordNovember 15, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a motion to recommit during debate on a bill related to foreign intelligence surveillance.
Share
More from Jane Harman
May 7, 2018
If we don't have European allies, going forward, and we have a large trade war with Europe, I worry that not only our policy toward Iran but our policy in many areas of the world will be harmed.
Apr 7, 2014
I agree with Senator Lieberman that Syria could easily become the sequel to Afghanistan in training large numbers of terrorists.
May 7, 2018
I think we should be very, very careful, given the Iraq experience, and if the people of Iran who elected their government by more than 50 percent in a four-way field want to change their government, then let them do that.





