I rise as a member of the Committee on Armed Services in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon]. I share the gentleman's goal of assisting military recruiters, and, like him, I support a strong defense and know that such a defense depends in substantial part on recruiting our best and brightest. But in achieving that goal, Mr. Chairman, we should not trample on the fundamental principles on which our society is based, like nondiscrimination and academic freedom. Unfortunately, Mr. Chairman, the amendment being offered by the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon] takes a meat ax approach to the issue of recruiter access to college campuses. That is why virtually every educational association, major university such as the University of California, the American Bar Association, and the Department of Defense oppose it. It is punitive and unnecessary. Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon].
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to military recruiter access to college campuses.
Share
More from Jane Harman
As Gabby's colleagues, we all have had moments with her, so many memories that we recall vividly and fondly. For me, she is a refreshing, frank, and inspiring younger member of the House sisterhood. She is whip smart and a serious and…
Mr. Chairman, I rise to support the Stenholm and Wise balanced budget amendments. It has become a cliche to say that there is no easy way to arrest our deficit problem. We've learned that reducing our borrowing levels is about making…
I rise today, with a bipartisan groups of cosponsors, to introduce the Felon Gun Prevention Act to close an obscene loophole in the Federal Code. Most Americans know that convicted felons lose certain rights including the right to vote…





