Given the zeal with which it promotes and supports instability in the Middle East, given its myopic obsession with the destruction of Israel, its arming of and financial assistance to Hezbollah and Hamas, and its implacable, duplicitous march towards a nuclear weapons capability, in my view, no other country comes close. The question that confronts us is how to cause Iran's government to abandon interest in a nuclear weapons program. Most agree--certainly, I do--that a multilateral approach is most likely to succeed.
Jane Harman: “Given the zeal with which it promotes and supports instability in the Middle East, given its myopic obsession with the…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the threat posed by Iran and the need for a multilateral approach to address its nuclear ambitions.
Share
More from Jane Harman
I think we should be very, very careful, given the Iraq experience, and if the people of Iran who elected their government by more than 50 percent in a four-way field want to change their government, then let them do that.
I think that the Kim regime in North Korea has regime survival as its first tenet--not helping its people but regime survival.
Should it have addressed Iran's other malign behavior? Yes, it should, and it still could, if this side agreement were entered into.
I think that if President Trump can reach a strong deal with the North Koreans he will deserve enormous credit.





