I commend to those who voted for the Sanders amendment and to those who voted against the Sanders amendment this particular bipartisan Dellums-Spence amendment. I spoke earlier in general debate, and I said that I support more effective, less costly defense that is ready for the next war, not the last one. I want the Pentagon to take full advantage of the revolution in military affairs as it modernizes equipment and doctrine for future conflicts, because that will ultimately bring costs down and effectiveness up. But modernizing requires an initial investment.
Jane Harman: “I commend to those who voted for the Sanders amendment and to those who voted against the Sanders amendment this…”
On the recordJune 19, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing defense budget cuts and support for a bipartisan amendment during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Jane Harman
May 7, 2018
I think leaving the deal on a unilateral basis...further isolates us and that's a mistake in terms of U.S. strategy.
May 7, 2018
I think it should be working, as we've all said, with Europe, who are in this deal in the first place, and hopefully with China and Russia, too, to contain nuclear developments in the region.
Jun 4, 2014
If the resources from the West just go into McMansions for a few oligarchs or fat bank accounts, that is unacceptable.
May 7, 2018
I think Congress is AWOL and Congress should be doing this, and the 2001 AUMF that most of us who are here voted for it seems to me doesn't apply to this situation at all.





