every morning in America, working families get up, send someone to work, sometimes two parents to work; they earn a paycheck, and they are required by law to send a big chunk of it back to the IRS in Washington, DC, so bureaucrats can make spending decisions for their families. The Republicans in this Congress have proposed empowering families by taking those spending decisions away from the IRS and putting them back where they belong. Our friends on the left do not agree with that proposal. They want to stop this tax cut, and the only way they can do it is to find some reason to be against it, and the argument we hear day after day is that it is a tax cut for the rich. We should ask ourselves who they mean by the rich. They mean people earning $50,000 a year, like the family that the distinguished gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Gephardt] showed us. If someone owns a TV set and can listen to this debate, they are probably the rich they are talking about.
James Rogan: “every morning in America, working families get up, send someone to work, sometimes two parents to work; they earn a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax cuts and their implications for working families.
Share
More from James Rogan
I am sorry that I cannot accept his amendment because his amendment would undermine and gut the entire purpose of the underlying bill. I just want to take a moment if I may to correct the record and I think the gentleman may have…
we Republicans find ourselves in a strange position. On the one hand, we benefit politically when the defenders of the status quo oppose choice in public schools. We benefit politically because school choice is something their own…
the Republican-led House voted overwhelmingly for Education Savings Accounts to give every American family the power to improve the educational choices for their children. Not every family today can afford a home computer or the SAT prep…
first I want to thank my distinguished colleague, the subcommittee chairman, for his comments. And I think that the chairman has hit the nail on the head: there are some procedural defects in what is currently on the books. I agree that…





