I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California will be postponed. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will read. The Clerk read as…
Jackie Speier
The Public Record
Jackie Speier is a former U.S. Representative from California, serving in the House of Representatives from January 3, 2008, until January 15, 2022. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented California's 14th congressional district. Speier is known for her advocacy on issues such as women's rights, healthcare, and gun control. She gained national attention for her work on the Sexual Assault Survivors' Bill of Rights and her efforts to address military sexual assault. Speier's political career began in the California State Assembly, where she served from 2002 to 2006 before moving to the U.S. Congress.
So this alternative dispute resolution would be valuable to providers in particular if it was a decision that was going to be made swiftly.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment. The Clerk read as follows: Page 21, line 2, after the dollar amount insert ``(reduced by $30,935,000)''. Page 59, line 20, after the dollar amount…
It is not often that I can use a passage from the Bible to describe an appropriations bill, but the money- wasting allocation of funds in this bill is perfectly described by the Gospel of Matthew. It observes: For whoever hath, to him…
We have been having a raging debate in this House over the Ex-Im Bank. Many of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle are screaming that that is, in fact, corporate welfare. Well, when the three largest oil companies in this…
So this is a problem we should be looking. Maybe this committee could undertake something that was constructive in nature and look at all of these agencies and whether or not there is sufficient backup of documentation.
I just wanted to point out on behalf of our colleague, Mrs. Maloney, that her point was that 501(c)(3)s and 501(c)(4)s are tax exempt, not that the donors' contributions necessarily are tax exempt.
the Speaker of this House today admonished all of us that we need to show respect to all the witnesses who come before us.
I find that pretty preposterous that we would have that kind of presumption.
So what is the harm done at this point in granting these pending applications and having a claw-back opportunity, if in fact it is determined that they are not legitimate?





