It simply says that PNTR is automatically revoked if China attacks, invades, or blockades Taiwan. Now, when we talk to people in the administration or even outside in the academic world, people who are China experts, they all say, but if China invades, attacks, or blockades Taiwan, of course we would revoke PNTR and much more. But, over and over again in history, we know that when nations do not tell the consequences for conduct for aggressive actions, other countries misread those consequences. Having studied what happened prior to the Gulf War for a very long time, I believe if we had made more clear to Saddam Hussein what would have happened should he invade Kuwait, that particular bloody battle could have been avoided. If all we are going to do is agree to revoke PNTR should this very real threat be implemented, then let us tell the Chinese beforehand.
Howard Berman: “It simply says that PNTR is automatically revoked if China attacks, invades, or blockades Taiwan. Now, when we talk to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of revoking Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China in the context of Taiwan.
Share
More from Howard Berman
Could I get another indication of the time remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from California has 4\1/2\ minutes remaining; the gentleman from Ohio has 3 minutes remaining; the gentlewoman from Florida has 30 seconds…
It is disingenuous, I have to say, Mr. Reese, for you to talk about finding the rate that will incentivize more webcasting by radio stations without acknowledging any obligation to be subject to a performance right for over-the-air…
I think this kind of 'gotcha politics,' the American people are really turned off by.
We must do our best to minimize the risks faced by these brave public servants and provide adequate funding to do so, but we must also recognize that such risks can never be completely eliminated.





